Now There’s Proof That Tiny Homes Are Better Homes

New research shows that downsizing to a tiny home can cut your ecological footprint by 45%.

New Frontier Tiny Homes’s Alpha, is one of the fanciest tiny homes around. The 240-square-foot modern design is super functional and good looking to boot. They also have a larger model, Escher, a model that at around 300 square feet, is more spacious and offers two bedrooms.

Downsizing to a tiny home also downsizes your carbon footprint. It might seem obvious that living smaller equates to a lighter impact on the environment—but now there’s proof. 

As part of her doctoral research at Virginia Tech, Dr Maria Saxton studied the ecological footprints and behaviors of 80 tiny home dwellers to see if small-space living really is a sustainable housing solution. Her research shows that simply living in a tiny home can reduce your impact on the environment by 45%—and the associated lifestyle changes yield further benefits.

Whether they downsized for financial freedom, more mobility, or a simpler lifestyle, all tiny home dwellers reduced their ecological footprint, the study showed.

“I found that after downsizing people were more likely to eat less energy-intensive food products and adopt more environmentally conscious eating habits, such as eating more locally and growing more of their own food,” Saxton wrote in an article published in The Conversation. “Participants traveled less by car, motorcycle, bus, train, and airplane, and drove more fuel-efficient cars than they did before downsizing.”

Saxton also found that tiny home owners bought significantly less stuff, recycled more, and generated less waste. This led her to surmise that we can be more eco-friendly simply by living smaller. 

Many tiny home dwellers develop eco-friendly habits when they downsize—like adopting a capsule wardrobe, carpooling more, and harvesting rainwater.

Although some of the 100+ behaviors Saxton associated with downsizing had a negative environmental effect (including traveling more and eating out more often), close to 90% of the changes were positive.

Saxton’s data goes so far as to show that we could save 366 million acres of biologically productive land if just 10% of Americans downsized to a tiny home. Saxton calculated the  impact of housing, transportation, food, goods, and services per hectare and found that tiny home downsizers in the US had an average ecological footprint of 3.87 global hectares compared to the average American’s footprint of 8.4 global hectares—a 45% difference.

This infographic summarizes Dr. Saxton's research on the ecological impact of living in a tiny home.

This infographic summarizes Dr. Saxton’s research on the ecological impact of living in a tiny home.

Courtsey Dr. Maria Saxton

See the full story on Dwell.com: Now There’s Proof That Tiny Homes Are Better Homes
Related stories:

  • This Newlywed Couple’s 100-Square-Foot Cabin Is the Island Hideaway of Our Dreams
  • Here's Your Once-in-a-Lifetime Chance to Sleep Inside a Giant Avocado
  • Humble Hand Craft’s Eco-Friendly Tiny Homes Spin Gold Out of Salvaged Wood

Similar Posts

  • Good Haus

    The Good Haus celebrates the intersection between design and performance – and seeks to be an example of a “good house”. The house is the family home of principals Mela Breen and David Good (designer and builder) – and playfully gets it’s moniker from Dave’s last name. So what is our idea of a good house? In this case it is one that is pushing the possibilities of a site specific design while holding itself accountable to reaching the highest level of energy efficiency. Our good house is one that embodies our beliefs about resiliency, efficiency, health and comfort, beauty and playfulness. The DNA for the Good Haus is established by the site, a steep and rocky hillside that spills down onto a small neighboring foothill meadow. A limited buildable footprint, season drainage concerns, and an inviting flat outcrop of granite drove the initial design. Two intersecting geometric volumes were conceived, each reaching out to connect the building to the landscape, each intersecting the other and providing counter balance. The main first floor volume is a long south facing rectangle that stretches and anchors in the granite. A deep west facing porch protects the house from overheating, bridges a rocky drainage and links the open floor plan to the landscape with a large outdoor living space. The second floor volume runs perpendicular to the main living space and cantilevers to create a covered north entry, while a balcony on the south side cantilevers towards the oak canopy – creating a sense that the master bedroom is in a tree house. The exterior material pallet is in keeping with our love for the handmade modern. Cedar siding from trees grown on Mela’s childhood property and milled by her father is mixed with standing seam metal roofing that turns downing to clad the walls as a way to articulate the building form. Because the topography falls roughly 12’ over the relatively narrow width of the house, and the granite spine to the west hinted at what might lay below the soils (giant boulders and bedrock), we opted to build the first floor primarily on a steel pier and beam structure with a metal pan deck. This allows the building to float above the rocky drainage. The complexity of the design, with its cantilevers and steel deck foundation, require a heightened attention to the air sealing and insulation details. The super insulated, air-tight building envelope is wrapped in exterior Rockwool insulation, all the connections between interior and exterior structural members are meticulously detailed to avoid thermal bridges, and triple pane European windows and doors are used to maximize light, comfort, and performance. A CO2 heat pump water heater provides the most efficient domestic hot water delivery. Balanced heat recovery ventilation offers high indoor air quality and uniform temperature distribution. Indoor climate control is provided by super efficient ductless mini splits. A 6.5 kw roof mounted photovoltaic system is installed to offset the home’s energy usage (including the charging of an electric car) – creating a zero net energy building.